Beckham rep denies magazine's claim he cheated with '$10,000-a-night hooker'
Sep 22, 2010, 11:30 AM EDT
So you’re David Beckham, you just return from a relaxing camping trip in the mountains with your kids, and you find this magazine cover in your mailbox. ‘Yikes!’ you say. ‘I’d rather take my chances with the armed Mexicans.’ In Touch Weekly claims to have the story of how Beckham cheated on his wife with a ‘$10,000-a-night hooker’ (see Tiger Woods, Life of: for details), which included a threesome and other debauchery. Call girl Irma Nici claims to have bent it with Beckham five times in 2007.
“It was a high,” Nici, 26, said to In Touch Weekly. “All of these women dream of being with him, and I got to hook up with him. It was very exciting.”
From the New York Daily News:
A rep for Beckham, 35, was quick to shoot down the cheating story Wednesday morning, telling UsMagazine.com that the allegations “are completely untrue and totally ridiculous, as the magazine was clearly told before publication.”
“Sadly we live in a world where a magazine can print lies and believe they can get away with it,” adds the rep. “We are taking legal action against the magazine.”
According to In Touch, Nici claims Beckham agreed to pay her $10,000 to spend one night together during their alleged affair.
First of all, I thought In Touch Weekly referred to Shawn Kemp and his baby mamas. I was wrong. I’m not sure what Nici’s end game is here … but she apparently got paid for an interview with In Touch, and that’s a start. What’s next, following Beckham around the country performing at strip clubs?
You know what they say; until the SUV plows into the fire hydrant, no real story here.
***
Soccer star denies paying call girl Irma Nici 10k [New York Daily News]
-
- mike - Sep 22, 2010 at 4:50 PM
-
Liar….
-
- Rod Davis - Sep 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM
-
I am sick and tired of the media doing whatever suits its fancy for the ratings – when will it stop?
-
- Guy Smiley - Sep 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM
-
this is the best thing I ever heard
Why are these famous rich people so gullible?
-
- David - Sep 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM
-
Correction, He paid $9,995.00 too much!!!
-
- Chrusher - Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM
-
Yawn…..
-
- NEENA - Sep 23, 2010 at 4:44 AM
-
this has to be one of the most outlandish rot i have read lately.he would run the risk to have sex for $10,000.00 when it would cost millions for a divorce if this was true. give me a break.
-
- Norm - Sep 23, 2010 at 7:19 PM
-
no he got $9,995.00 in change.
-
- Norm - Sep 23, 2010 at 7:25 PM
-
you might also notice that the title is “Beckham rep denies magazine’s claim he cheated with ‘$10,000-a-night hooker’” not that he paid her $10,000 it could have been her night off
I mean hell clinton just got a bj and that cost $50,000,000 10K is a deal!